To establish that two vector spaces are isomorphic, we must find an isomorphism between them, an invertible linear transformation (Definition IVS). The range of the linear transformation $T$, $\rng{T}$, is a subspace of $V$, while the column space of the matrix representation, $\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$ is a subspace of $\complex{m}$. The function $\vectrepname{C}$ is defined as a function from $V$ to $\complex{m}$, but we can just as well employ the definition of $\vectrepname{C}$ as a function from $\rng{T}$ to $\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$.
We must first insure that if we choose an input for $\vectrepname{C}$ from $\rng{T}$ that then the output will be an element of $\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$. So suppose that $\vect{v}\in\rng{T}$. Then there is a vector $\vect{u}\in U$, such that $\lt{T}{\vect{u}}=\vect{v}$. Consider \begin{align*} \matrixrep{T}{B}{C}\vectrep{B}{\vect{u}} &=\vectrep{C}{\lt{T}{\vect{u}}}&&\knowl{./knowls/theorem.FTMR.knowl}{\text{Theorem FTMR}}\\ &=\vectrep{C}{\vect{v}}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.RLT.knowl}{\text{Definition RLT}} \end{align*}
This says that $\vectrep{C}{\vect{v}}\in\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$, as desired.
The restriction in the size of the domain and codomain will not affect the fact that $\vectrepname{C}$ is a linear transformation (Theorem VRLT), nor will it affect the fact that $\vectrepname{C}$ is injective (Theorem VRI). Something must be done though to verify that $\vectrepname{C}$ is surjective. This all gets a bit confusing, since the domain of our isomorphism is the range of the linear transformation, so think about your objects as you go. To establish that $\vectrepname{C}$ is surjective, appeal to the definition of a surjective linear transformation (Definition SLT), and suppose that we have an element of the codomain, $\vect{y}\in\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}\subseteq\complex{m}$ and we wish to find an element of the domain with $\vect{y}$ as its image. Since $\vect{y}\in\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$, there exists a vector, $\vect{x}\in\complex{n}$ with $\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}\vect{x}=\vect{y}$.
We now show that the desired element of the domain is $\vect{v}=\vectrepinv{C}{\vect{y}}$. First, verify that $\vect{v}\in\rng{T}$ by applying $T$ to $\vect{u}=\vectrepinv{B}{\vect{x}}$, \begin{align*} \lt{T}{\vect{u}}&=\lt{T}{\vectrepinv{B}{\vect{x}}}\\ &=\vectrepinv{C}{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}\left(\vectrep{B}{\vectrepinv{B}{\vect{x}}}\right)}&&\knowl{./knowls/theorem.FTMR.knowl}{\text{Theorem FTMR}}\\ &=\vectrepinv{C}{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}\left(\lt{I_{\complex{n}}}{\vect{x}}\right)}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.IVLT.knowl}{\text{Definition IVLT}}\\ &=\vectrepinv{C}{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}\vect{x}}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.IDLT.knowl}{\text{Definition IDLT}}\\ &=\vectrepinv{C}{\vect{y}}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.CSM.knowl}{\text{Definition CSM}}\\ &=\vect{v}&&\text{Substitution}\\ \end{align*} Second, verify that the proposed isomorphism, $\vectrepname{C}$, takes $\vect{v}$ to $\vect{y}$, \begin{align*} \vectrep{C}{\vect{v}}&=\vectrep{C}{\vectrepinv{C}{\vect{y}}}&&\text{Substitution}\\ &=\lt{I_{\complex{m}}}{\vect{y}}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.IVLT.knowl}{\text{Definition IVLT}}\\ &=\vect{y}&&\knowl{./knowls/definition.IDLT.knowl}{\text{Definition IDLT}} \end{align*}
With $\vectrepname{C}$ demonstrated to be an injective and surjective linear transformation from $\rng{T}$ to $\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$, Theorem ILTIS tells us $\vectrepname{C}$ is invertible, and so by Definition IVS, we say $\rng{T}$ and $\csp{\matrixrep{T}{B}{C}}$ are isomorphic.